Forum Thread

Rant & Rave Rand Paul

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 3 Posts
  • Democrat
    Missouri
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Thirteen hours of continuous standing and talking under filibuster rules. I'm impressed with this individual's stamina, however I have a little commentation. If Rand Paul is so concerned about the killing of US citizens by drones than why does he stand against gun control and violence against Women. People with assault-looking guns in America have the potential to kill many more US citizens than Drones. It doesn't make sense. His philosophy is skewed on backwards.

    I do think that Rand Paul takes the Walmart greeter award for hours standing and talking. I also believe that the true intention of Rand Paul standing for 13 hours is the making of a new Depends for Men commercial.
  • Independent
    Plymouth, WI
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    I am a bit clueless on this subject, but from what I am getting, Rand Paul talked for over half a day worried about drones killing us? Since it is just our government who flies drones here, he is saying our government is going to start using drones to kill us, is this correct?
  • Independent
    Ft.myers, FL
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    unitedmajority Wrote: I am a bit clueless on this subject, but from what I am getting, Rand Paul talked for over half a day worried about drones killing us? Since it is just our government who flies drones here, he is saying our government is going to start using drones to kill us, is this correct?
    I would not worry; I think the polution and traffic accidents may kill you way before that, or may be a nuthead with an AR-15 or Ak47. Wow!!