Forum Thread

who in the word watches FOX "news"


Reply to ThreadDisplaying 16 - 20 of 20 Prev 1 2
  • Dutch
    04-16-2022 08:54:24 AM
    Not Logged In
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    The point is that you can't run an country with no limits on anything. That's why you should have solid laws where also our "zillion" lawyers can't tinker with. Here it is the "cowboy" style of governing originating in England, which is also an arrogant "island" related to world law. All of this has grown out of proportion, especially with only "two" parties which have grown miles apart. The "media" always should have "limits" on how far they can go in such huge mixture of people which we have here. The anomalies here are obvious that this is an "not" controlled well thought of structure of governing. Britain copes with the same thing and is also an mess. The Constitution is totally outdated and should be updated on an daily basis; not even the "Amendment's" are up to date, like the outdated "gun" laws. The license of FOX News should be revoked and proper laws been drafted for the media as a whole. This system here "corrupts" everything because our lawyers get rich from it and of course loves "mountains" of paperwork and stick their dumb ass heads into molded old paper of different times. Ask Canada on how to do it.
  • that guy in AZ
    09-02-2022 12:05:55 PM
    Not Logged In
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    It looks like Hell has frozen over.

    Laura Ingraham, who is one of the wackier FOX talking heads, recently turned on Trump.

    Conservative media commentator Ann Coulter, once a fan of former Republican president Donald Trump and now a harsh critic, took another swipe at him this week.

    In a podcast, she said, “You don’t need to suck up to Trump any more, conservative talk radio hosts, talk TV hosts, Republicans running for office. He’s done. He’s over.”

    In a tweet linking to the podcast, she also told followers, “Conservative media is lying to you about Trump’s popularity.”

    Coulter made similar points in a January column in which she declared, “No one wants Trump. He’s fading faster than Sarah Palin did — and she was second place on a losing presidential ticket.”

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/09/01/nation/once-fan-ann-coulter-takes-another-swipe-trump/

  • Dutch
    09-02-2022 04:50:15 PM
    Not Logged In
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    Fox as well CNN ( slowly but surely with the "shares" games) are in the hands of our sweetheart (Murdock) in Australia; thus even CNN had to fire one of their best reporters because of it.

    Sorry but the media here is in the wrong hands; also due to the "free speech" stupidity here. In other countries they have "boundaries" about how far you can go in the news , otherwise you get types as Hitler and Stalin did with their "propaganda".

    Here it has become an "tool" to indoctrinate and spew "falsehoods". All of this continuous "hammering" and spewing their garbage sways the people in their direction, especially on an "island" like this. No wonder we get the Trump/DeSantis types as "leaders". Wake up America and curtail "free speech" where needed.

  • that guy in AZ
    02-28-2023 07:16:46 AM
    Not Logged In
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    FOX is in serious trouble, and will very likely lose the Dominion lawsuit.

    Heather provided more detail last night.

    https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/february-27-2023

  • Dutch
    02-28-2023 12:49:13 PM
    Not Logged In
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    I still can't understand that an Australian Murdock has any "say" here. As well can "meddle" via the "media " etc. in our political system. Sorry to say our Constitutional "writers" had no clue and barely knew where Australia was the "map".

    So again I mention that our Constitution is "outdated" and needs to be fixed to be an "living" up to date document with "strict" limits on certain things. Our present "lawyers" do as they like and "interpret" as they like; nothing here is "black or white" and "definitive".

    Most of our "legal issues" as well our "lawyers" have become "agents" of "chaos" in order to fill their own pockets. They like it this way and refuse to put in any effort to make it "fool" proof.

    None of them wants an "updated version" with specific "limits" on anything affecting the "present society"; a lot has changed since 1776 but only very few of any changes were applied to the Constitution, except "case laws" which need way too much research and often are not "coherent" with the "base laws" of 1776. Lots of laws are missing "limits"; especially in "case laws" as well the Constitution is often very "vague" and does not "specify" on how certain laws should be carried out in an total different working "society" with all kinds of "imports" as well the cultural revolutions/"inventions" taken place since then from all over the world since 1776.

    When the Constitution was written we did not have imported "millions of people" from all kind of different cultures as well all kind of "religions" in the picture. Neither had the "blacks/colored" people any say in it at such time. We even had an "black" president not too long ago, which the writers of the Constitution never foresaw. So the only solution is to update the Constitution to the days we live in with in mind the present "culture and "modern' world as it is today and being kept up to date by having "strict discipline" and "limits" within our laws so "no partisan crooked lawyers" as well "politicians" can play games with it as they do now. Amen

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 16 - 20 of 20 Prev 1 2