Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Just wait until the BLS readjusts those UE figures. In Previous adjustments, from past years, they edited those figures which meant that the unemployment of people was actually higher than reported earlier. In other words, I did a search a while back when employment figures showed that for at least one month last year, it was reported that 180,000 new jobs were created, in truth and fact, only about 112,000 new jobs became available. In other words, lack of employment is sugar coated and bumped up or down using several different methods to conclude employed vs unemployed. It's usually the earlier (bumped up) to show that everything is hunky dory, when it's actually inflated employment numbers to paint a rosy economic picture. Which the BLS usually always does.
It doesn't take into account what Jared wrote about, people working part time jobs and more than one in some cases, people who just stopped looking for gainful employment, people who have exhausted all of their UE benefits and stopped applying for them, plus many other factors which were not taken into account. The BLS should change their acronym to ALLBS.
Full time employment these days is hard to come by because people (workers) seem to want a benefit or two when being employed full time, and companies and corporations are not into giving any fringe benefits, hence, hire more part time employees so they don't have to provide any fringe benefits.
BTW, the federal minimum wage is still $7.25 per hour. In my state, that's the state minimum wage, and here, employers take full unfair advantage of that fact. Figure it out, $7.25 X 30 hours = $217.50, figure 30 hours times 4 weeks in a month, and that's only $870.00 per month, which a person is supposed to pay rent, pay utilities, have a phone, a car, pay health and auto liability insurance, and this is why our economy isn't all that great as republicans say that it is.