Forum Thread

Trump's tweets

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 16 - 17 of 17 Prev 1 2
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    Twitter finally took action against propaganda being broadcast on its site when it started to label some of Trump's tweets as false. Just recently, they suspended Don Jr's account for his advocacy of false information about the coronavirus.

    It didn't take long for the crazy people to respond. Here is the complete letter that I received from Paul Gosar this morning.

    Today, U.S. Representatives Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S. (AZ-4), Doug Collins (GA-9), Ralph Norman (SC-5), Lance Gooden (TX-5), Steve King (IA-4), Jim Banks (IN-3), Matt Gaetz (FL-1), Ted Yoho (FL-3), Tom Tiffany (WI-12), Ron Wright (TX-6), and Glenn Grothman (WI-6) introduced H.R. 7808 Stop the Censorship Act of 2020.

    Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (Section 230) affords Big Tech immunity from liability for third-party content. Section 230's "Good Samaritan" provision provides immunity for the removal of users and content, and has been abused by Big Tech to censor competition and lawful speech. Political candidates, small businesses, medical professionals, pro-life advocates, journalists, authors, artists, comedians, supporters of President Trump, and many more are being censored by Google, Twitter, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, and other online platforms.

    This legislation revokes immunity for the removal of competition and lawful speech, empowers users to protect themselves from objectionable material, and aligns with focused reforms recently recommended by the Justice Department: Reform to Promote Open Discourse and Greater Transparency

    Section 230 currently provides online platforms with immunity for the removal of anything they perceive to be "otherwise objectionable." The vagueness of the term "otherwise objectionable" grants platforms immunity to remove any speech they don't like, without any potential recourse for the user. Stop the Censorship Act revokes immunity for the removal of "otherwise objectionable" material and instead provides a new standard of immunity for content removal - "unlawful, or that promotes violence or terrorism." This provision also incentivizes platforms to be more transparent and abide by their own terms of service. Current terms of service are largely irrelevant while immunity is extended for the removal of anything that platforms consider to be "otherwise objectionable". Click here for more information from the Justice Department. Reform to Promote Competition

    Section 230 greatly contributed to the size and power of Big Tech. Online platforms have argued that the inclusion of the term "otherwise objectionable" creates immunity from antitrust claims (Enigma Sofware v. Malwarebytes). Stop the Censorship Act ensures that Section 230 does not extend immunity for antitrust claims aimed at promoting and preserving competition. Click here for more information from the Justice Department. Instead of empowering Big Tech with immunity to remove anything they don't like, this legislation extends protections to online platforms for "any action taken to provide users with the option to restrict access to any other material," empowering users to choose content filter options.

    “Online platforms should not have special immunity to censor competition and lawful political speech,” said Rep. Gosar. “The broad and undue immunity for content and user removal granted by Section 230 must be reined in by Congress. We cannot continue to subsidize, deputize, or blackmail Silicon Valley to decide what is or isn't an allowable conversation. Stop the Censorship Act of 2020 empowers users and limits Big Tech to the same rights and liabilities as everyone else.”

    “Freedom of speech and market competition are two of the strongest pillars of American freedom. But ‘Big Tech,’ has shown little regard for either. Congress must protect the values that make America great." said Rep. Banks.

    “Our country was founded on the free exchange of ideas and the ability of all Americans to speak freely, a principle that has allowed the Internet to thrive,” said Rep. Collins. “But in recent years, companies like Twitter and Google have used Section 230 as a shield while unlawfully abusing the First Amendment rights of their users. It’s time we put an end to Big Tech’s unlawful censorship by rolling back their broad protections and promoting market competition, which is exactly what the Stop the Censorship Act of 2020 will do.”

    “Freedom of speech is paramount to the fabric of America. No one should have the power to censor political speech, including ‘Big Tech’,” said Rep. Gooden.

    Congressman Gosar first introduced the Stop the Censorship Act on July 25, 2019. Today’s introduction of Stop the Censorship Act of 2020 aligns with recent recommendations for Section 230 reform from the Justice Department and complements President Donald J. Trump's Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    Facebook took down a video posted by the campaign of President Trump on Wednesday in which he claimed children were immune to the coronavirus, a violation of the social network’s rules against misinformation around the virus.

    It was the first time Facebook has removed a post by Mr. Trump’s campaign for spreading misinformation about the coronavirus, though the social network has previously taken down other ads and posts by the campaign for violating other policies. In June, for example, Facebook took down campaign ads that used a Nazi-related symbol, which broke the company’s rules against organized hate.

    Twitter on Wednesday also blocked the Trump campaign’s post with the video, saying it had violated company rules on coronavirus misinformation. The account was barred from posting new tweets until the offending post was removed, a typical procedure, Twitter said. Later Wednesday evening, the video was removed from the Trump campaign account and it had resumed posting.

    Some of the other posts that Facebook has removed from Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign include misleading ads about the 2020 census in March. Facebook said the ads could have caused confusion about the timing of the census.§ion=Technology