Forum Thread

House passes Minimum Wage of $15/hour

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 1 - 15 of 17 1 2 Next
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    The House of Representatives passed a minimum wage increase of $15/hour by the year 2025. The vote was 231-199 vote with six Democrats opposing it and three Republicans supporting it. It is not expected to pass the Mitch McConnell Republican controlled Senate if it even comes up for a vote.

    The wage is phased in as follows: $8.40 in 2019, $9.50 in 2020, $10.60 in 2021, $11.70 in 2022, $12.80 in 2023, $13.90 in 2024 and $15 in 2025. After 2025 it is indexed to future increases in median wage gains.

    The bill eventually abolishes the lower minimum wage for tipped workers and eliminates a seldom used pay floor for teen workers that pays them less than the minimum wage.

    By reference, the current minimum wage is $7.25 per hour passed a decade ago. However, 29 states and Washington, D.C. have higher than the federal minimum wage, and seven of those have approved $15 per hour minimum wages.

    I did a quick calculation of what the minimum wage in 1963 (my high school wage) would be today if it was indexed to inflation. My 1963 minimum wage of $1.25 per hour would be equivalent to $10.46 per hour in 2019. Then assuming a 3 percent inflation rate from now until 2025, the 1963 minimum wage indexed to inflation to the year 2025 would be $12.49 per hour.

    Looking at the 1963 wage of $1.25 per hour another way, as mentioned before it is $10.46 per hour in 2019 adjusted for actual inflation, but the $15 per hour wage in 2025 would necessitate a 6.2 percent inflation between 2019 and 2025 to be equivalent to the 1963 minimum wage.

    I'm sure no one is impressed with my calculations, but I like to throw them out anyway to put things in perspective.


  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?


    A couple of years ago, one of our conservative relatives posted an article that implied it was ridiculous to pay a "burger flipper" $15 an hour, when people in the military made the same wage.

    This one is a complicated topic, and it generated a VERY lengthy response.

    The short version, of course, is that the first sentence above is a silly argument, since it does not take into consideration a number of factors.

    The other surprise is that the Republican Party of Eisenhower sounds an awful lot like the Democratic Party of Barack Obama:

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
    Most non disruptive way to raise the minimum wage would be a Job Guarantee as it immediately adds to sales creating market forces that support the private sector’s higher wage bill. You still need a statutory minimum wage bc you want to be able to prosecute abusers and can’t assume the JG will catch all workers (although it is supposed to do that).
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?


    I'm of the opinion that a higher minimum wage is a better solution, since it mitigates the problem that a job guarantee won't.

    According to Forbes, the average Walmart cost taxpayers between $900,000 and $1.7 million a year because its employees don't make enough to pay for food, housing, insurance, and food on the wages they earn working:

    A related issue to a job guarantee is a guaranteed annual income, a concept that was proposed by Governor Huey Long in 1934. His program was called "Share the Wealth":

    A few of the elements of the program eventually became national law:

    An old-age pension would be made available for all persons over 60.

    To balance agricultural production, the government would preserve/store surplus goods, abolishing the practice of destroying surplus food and other necessities due to lack of purchasing power

    Veterans would be paid what they were owed (a pension and healthcare benefits)

    Free education and training for all students to have equal opportunities in all schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions for training in the professions and vocations of life

    Variations of the first and last parts of his program are still under consideration by at least some of the Democratic candidates for president, at least by those who espouse raising taxes on wealthy people (e.g. Elizabeth Warren).

    The downside of a job guarantee is that it doesn't mean a guaranteed income, and the best example is the approach used by the Soviet Union:

    People joked “We pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us.” But the upside was that a fired worker could always find another job, since — thanks to the low wages — there was a labor shortage.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    House passage is meaningless without the senate on board. McConnell won't even bring it to the floor.

    15 an hour should start now, not at the end of 2025. 15 an hour in 2025 will be behind the time, people will need at least 20 an hour in 2025 to survive.

    Tax breaks as incentives for corporate to hire new and allow higher wages for present workers is smoke and mirrors.

    I would suggest lawmakers are out of touch with reality, when was the last time any of them pumped their own gas or grocery shopped?

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    Seattle was the first city in the country to pass a $15 per hour wage, which it did in 2015. Overall, the higher minimum wage had more positive than negative impacts.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    UBI is inherently inflationary.

    But not all basic or non basic income schemes are bad or disruptive, especially when limited in nature, e.g. social security for disabled or retired or meager benefits for unemployed.

    Criticism of a job guarantee on the lines that it would be ‘make work’ could just as easily be applied to all government employment, as that’s what many anti-gov right-wingers claim now. The WPA and CCC programs during the Depression were not thought of as ‘make work.’ Those folks worked their tails off.

    But the point of the MMT JG is not the work done per se but that the workers ‘transition’ to ‘normal’ employment. That’s how it’s anti inflationary bias works. So while we want to see tangible gains for society from the work done, that’s an add-on benefit. The point is to get people back in the private sector.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    Yesterday, Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times published an article about Denmark, which has a minimum was of $22 an hour.

    Naturally, that caused me to a little more research, which led to the article posted below:

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
    By the year 2025. There are some who think it would be a good idea now. 4 1/2 years from now is a very long time. One of these days.... Not really but it's nice to think about.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    There's 75 separate threads labeled "minimum wage" on this site, so I decided to add some additional comments to the most recent one, which was added by Schmidt in 2019.

    There's a bunch of Republicans who think that feel that $15 an hour is too much, but consider this:

    Costco just announced that the company is raising its minimum wage to $16 an hour for its 180,000 employees, starting next week.

    How can they do that?

    Easy, the company is more profitable than Walmart.

    Costco is one of the most efficient retailers in the U.S., generating significantly high revenues per square foot of space, compared to most of its peers. This metric is a key indicator of how effectively a retailer is utilizing its space to drive revenues. According to our estimates, Costco’s revenue per square foot is likely to increase from $1,540 in 2017 to nearly $1,640 by the end of our forecast period.

    Walmart, on the other hand generates less than half of these revenues per square foot, although we expect these to rise at a faster pace.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    The city of Tucson just raised the minimum wage of all city workers to $15 an hour.

    The statewide minimum wage in Arizona was $12.15 as of Jan. 1 and ranks among the highest in the country. Ironically, Arizona has some of the worst unemployment benefits ($240 a week) but the legislature is in the process of trying to raise that amount to over $300.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
    It's not about dollars and cents, it's about keeping the bottom 50% struggling to survive. Hopefully many ideas come up.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
    May be a cartoon of one or more people and text that says 'Who benefits from a higher minimum wage? 一 WHAT PEOPLE THINK Teenager THE REALITY Works part time after school Average age: 35 years old Lives with parents 90% are not teens, they're 20 or older Earning extra spending money 59% are women 28% have children 54% work full time Essential and front-line workers make majority those who would benefit. Statisties More woukdbe affected 515.00 Economie Institute'
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?

    Majority of Americans support $15 minimum wage, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows

    Some 59 percent of Americans support increasing the minimum wage to $15 per hour. That includes a lot of Republicans. However, Congressional Republicans are nearly unanimously against it calling it a "job killer". What many of these millionaire Republicans in Congress do not like is having to pay household staff a living wage.

    Of course, raising the wage will effect some jobs, child care being one of them. However, at the same time it will increase consumer spending because those making the minimum wage are more likely to spend it rather than save or invest it.

    CNBC: How raising minimum wage to $15 per hour could affect workers and small businesses

    Overall, the pluses outweigh the minuses.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
    Those Congressional Republicans are not listening to their constituents as much as they're listening to the ones writing the checks because, it's expensive getting reelected.