Are you sure you want to delete this post?
She's already testified before congress that she knew nothing about paying off storm Daniels and other illegal activities. Now that court documents have shown she was involved, the House wants her to come back and clarify. Now she got weeks to figure out how to spin everything so it sounds plausible. However, I expect over 95% of her responses will be:
"I don't recall"
"I can't answer because the president has executive privilege."
"I chose not to answer on grounds that I might incriminate myself"
Unless she slips up, it will be a Q&A session of stonewalling and non-answers. Even when asked to explain her activites that were revealed in the court documents, she will have prepared answers (by attorneys) that either clears herself, claims the facts are "Fake Facts", or has some alternative story such as it was not really her at those meetings describe in the court documents, it was really a doppelganger created by evil scientists hired by the whore Hillary Clinton to frame a innocent Christian Donald Trump, who has never cheated on any of his wives. No lie is too extreme for his base to believe. They love a good lie, the bigger the fish tale, the better.