Does the "Deep State really exist?
-
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
I had never heard of the term, "deep state", until more recently. We have over 4 million federal employees, and to me that's what the term denotes -- the largely unelected dedicated civil servants in our various branches of government that keep the wheels of government turning no matter who is elected or appointed to lead them. It can be a positive aspect of our society such that someone like Trump cannot change on a dime the minds of these civil servants to think like him or automatically salute his various cabinet heads and other appointments. Most all of them have been vetted by the FBI and I would assume that they take their jobs seriously. Take the EPA, for example. Scott Pruitt is attempting to decimate that organization of its dedicated employees, but many are resisting and working to undermine his purges. Is that good or bad? Each government organization or agency has a mass of life long employees who understand how their respective branches of government work. They are a culture of sorts, much like every company has a corporate culture. And they have unelected leaders, people who largely have the trust of their fellow employees and are defensive about intrusions by outside political appointments. The deep state can act as a positive stabilizing influence when authoritarian leaders like Trump are elected, but also a negative when a leader like Obama wants to bring more efficiency to an organization that might include job cuts (e.g. the military industrial complex). In the case of Trump, many of those civil servants have their own networks and can leak when they perceive our constitution is under attack. It's Trump's frustration that unlike his Trump business organization, he cannot control the deep state. I see that as a positive.
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Schmidt Wrote:In the case of Trump, many of those civil servants have their own networks and can leak when they perceive our constitution is under attack. It's Trump's frustration that unlike his Trump business organization, he cannot control the deep state. I see that as a positive. The way you're describing "The Deep State" is more-or-less the bureaucracy of the federal government, which is the 4 million career employees that get to keep their jobs no matter who is elected. They are the people that implement the decisions that come down from the top and also implement typical business methods the keep the government running. They handle the day-to-day, month-to-month, year-to-year, etc, functionality of the government. They are people from all poltical parties and\or none at all. Nearly everyone knows or is related to someone who works for the government. In Trump World, as defined by trump, The Deep State, are non-elected people both inside and outside of government, that control everything. In Trump World, if congress passes a law that The Deep State does not like, the DS makes sure that law never takes effect or never gets any funding. If trump appoints someone loyal to him to head the FBI, The DS, feeds the guy false information, keeps him in the dark, and conspires against him. In Trump World, The DS controls the lives of the American people much like in George Orwell's 1984. his base is absolute certain that the Deep States exist as an evil enity, and the main stream media is part of the conspiracy. They believe we are living in some version of that 1984 reality. Its almost like Left vs Right is a debate between "The World is round" vs "The World is flat" in terms of extreme differences in perception of what is real and not real. In trump world, that sweet old lady that lives in the neighborhood, very well could be part of the Deep State, reporting the activities of what happening in the neighborhood, and has bugs in everyone's home, but everyone just thinks of her as the neighborhood Grandma.
-
-
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
I think that "Deep State" is just an ominous sounding term for the bureaucracy. In some ways, the unelected bureaucracy really is ominous. But not in any ways we weren't already aware of.
For example, do you think Trump is au fait with the US's policy on Uganda? How about Mauritius? Of course not. He just signs his consent to the continuation of US policy in those regions, probably without even reading it first.
Chances are, even Obama had, at best, only the most passing acquaintance with our policy on most other nations, and of domestic policy too. Someone would simply pass him what he needed to know when he needed to know it. Did he check it for accuracy? No. He didn't have time. He had to trust that the civil servants, policy wonks and intelligence agencies were providing him with good information.
And therein is how the unelected bureaucrats can exert great power over the elected leaders. They can pass them policies that are already written, that they don't have time to read, and ask them to sign or vote. They can give them information that is cherry picked or massaged to influence them in one direction, and so on. It won't always work. The elected officials have the ability to stop and take a look at what they're signing, demand clarifications, and reject it or demand revisions. But it will work a lot of the time, and that makes the bureaucracy powerful.
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Yes when one thinks in terms of the deep state as being the vast government bureaucracy, then it has both positives and negatives. The positive, of course, is that the government functions 24/7 and 365 days a year (even with a government shutdown) despite changes in leadership at the top. Just about every president, Republicans and Democrats, have tried to trim the organization to be more cost effective and efficient, and all run into resistance because all those initiatives translates into jobs lost. However, as you noted, no president has time to micromanage the 4 million plus employees worldwide. That's why it is so important to hire competent and experienced people for his/her leadership team (including ambassador posts) to be able assess and reorganize staff as necessary to eliminate deadweight or add people where necessary in a changing world, and more importantly to earn their trust. Furthermore, when it comes to implementation of policies, it is important for the president and the many competent department heads to communicate a vision and strategy that is well thought out and that can be embraced by the many employees down the line and not undermined. An authoritarian president like Donald Trump shows his weaknesses by his outright ignorance of government and invites contempt by the deep state when he clings to campaign promises that were poorly thought out in the first place...e.g. building the wall, trade deals, Iran nuclear deal, climate change initiatives, immigration and more. In Trump's first address to the CIA, for example, he showed just how little he knew, and he certainly didn't earn any respect from the dedicated employees there. Ditto for just about every other organization. He got off to a bad start because he was unqualified to begin with, an exceptionally bad businessman who tried to bring his bad business practices into managing the government. The only thing he was good at was lying...and being a fuckin con artist. What we have with the Trump administration is a kakistocracy, a form of government in which the least competent worst persons are in power.
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
-
-
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Schmidt Wrote:What we have with the Trump administration is a kakistocracy, a form of government in which the least competent worst persons are in power. Very little doubt it applies to trump, personal staff, and appointments. Just in today's news, the president appointed his personal doctor as head of the VA. The guy may not be a bad person, but the reason trump liked him is because the guy looks and sounds good on TV. Even if he is a decent person, that does not make him qualified to make decisions that impact millions of vets. Also, its very interesting that trump, the president of US, is being turned down by the "A" list of attorneys to represent him. These are attorneys that say yes to any other past president, but when they look at the risks, its not worth it. So that leaves trump searching lesser experienced people who may already questionable credentials.
Job Posting Ad: Wanted Attorneys for POTUS Qualifications - Looks and sound good on TV
- Speak fluent Russian
- Has many Russians contacts
- Unethical
- Able to lie on command
- Experience in money laundering
- Takes verbal abuse well.
- Enjoys being randomize
- Laughs at racist jokes.
- Female applicants must be hot (like his daughter) and under the age of 30.
- A brown noser, like Devin Nunes.
- Law degree not required, but recommended.
-
-
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
-
|