Forum Thread

Gun control and school shootings.

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 16 - 25 of 25 Prev 1 2
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    Another shooting and no direct movement to keep guns out of schools. Monitored weapons detector entrances.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    So, this morning, on my other local news, (Milwaukee) they reported that there's a bill on governor Walker's desk for signature of $100M funding for school safety, nothing about gun control at all. I'm afraid that's what most states are going to do, they're going to throw money at the problems, which isn't too surprising, that's what government usually does when trying to fix a problem.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    The counties in NW Florida are expanding presence of resource officers including off duty sheriff and police officers.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Chet Ruminski Wrote: The counties in NW Florida are expanding presence of resource officers including off duty sheriff and police officers.

    I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing. There was an armed officer at the most recent school massacre and he did nothing. I can tell you that a semi auto pistol isn't a match against an AR-15, especially if it's equipped with a bump stock, plus, semi auto pistols are not that accurate, at least not as accurate as a rifle. An officer would need to confront a rifle shooter almost face to face to get a good accurate shot at the offender, which probably isn't likely to happen.

    I think a portion of that school safety bill in my state had something in it about arming teachers and sending teachers to training sessions, bad idea, IMHO.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Dockadams Wrote:
    Chet Ruminski Wrote: The counties in NW Florida are expanding presence of resource officers including off duty sheriff and police officers.

    I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing. There was an armed officer at the most recent school massacre and he did nothing. I can tell you that a semi auto pistol isn't a match against an AR-15, especially if it's equipped with a bump stock, plus, semi auto pistols are not that accurate, at least not as accurate as a rifle. An officer would need to confront a rifle shooter almost face to face to get a good accurate shot at the offender, which probably isn't likely to happen.

    I think a portion of that school safety bill in my state had something in it about arming teachers and sending teachers to training sessions, bad idea, IMHO.

    It's a bad stop gap feel good poorly thought out measure . Who is more important to a mother or father their child or the president? I work cloose to NAS Pensacola where the President lands . It is really impressive to see what happens around the time he comes. A couple of days before a fleet of black SUVs land and they start going over the routes. Then on the arrival that fleet plus Sherrif and Police cars proceed his caravan clearing streets and blocking side street entrances. People live with it. It would be easy to harden and protect schools without causing mental issues. But in the meantime to stop school shootings school shootings continue. Gun control and stopping school shootings do not have a common solution.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    "I think a portion of that school safety bill in my state had something in it about arming teachers and sending teachers to training sessions, bad idea, IMHO."

    Good idea as long as they are not required to take any action. I see nothing wrong with a teacher in a closed room during active shooter alert having a firearm issued through training.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Chet Ruminski Wrote:

    "I think a portion of that school safety bill in my state had something in it about arming teachers and sending teachers to training sessions, bad idea, IMHO."

    Good idea as long as they are not required to take any action. I see nothing wrong with a teacher in a closed room during active shooter alert having a firearm issued through training.

    Maybe you'd like it where schools had two types of alarm systems? One sound for a fire, another sound for an active shooter.

    No, teachers need to be teaching. Teachers do not need to fill the role of defender with a firearm. We do not need Barney Fife types walking around with pistols strapped on their hips.

    How about some gun control?

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    The Washington Post reminded us today that the 20th anniversary of the shooting at Columbine is on April 20 - but the school is apparently still receiving threats.

    After the shooting, the police were slow to enter the school, and they were heavily criticized for not intervening during the shooting. The incident resulted in the introduction of the Immediate Action Rapid Deployment tactic, which is used in situations where an active shooter is trying to kill people rather than take hostages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre

    After Parkland, lock down drills were modified due to the fact that the shooter at THAT school pulled fire alarms to create panic before the shooting. Now, lock down directions are to IGNORE any fire drill alarm if it goes off during a lock down.

    After the shooting at Columbine, Wayne LaPierre went on record stating that he believed in universal back ground checks for ALL gun purchases.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-oqfPojhec

    Since Columbine, there have been 50 murders, or attempted murders, in schools. In 81% of those shootings, a third party had information that the attacker was thinking about or planning the attack.

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/school-shootings-columbine-numbers/story?id=36833245

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    I watched the documentary on Columbine. In hindsight which is 2020 there were multiple warning signs. Somebody made the statement on some program that these inhumanity cruel people are not born that way. Wrong . I have seen kids mean as soon as they made expressive actions. Watched them grow leading lives that made hell for their families. Alerting on any negative sign would be impossible.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    jaredsxtn Wrote:
    Chet Ruminski Wrote: "The answer, at least to me, is really quite simple - ban the vast majority of guns and institute a gun buyback program for the newly banned guns. "

    Trouble is the above would take years and many billions of dollars to accomplish.

    We spend roughly $600 billion a year on "defense" spending. What's a few extra billion to buy back a bunch of guns? Aren't you someone who ascribes to the theory that everything in the world can be free?

    Chet Ruminski Wrote: Your virtual prisons is an exaggeration. Almost all the places you described have restricted and monitored entrances . It would be almost imperceptible to convert them to weapons monitoring .

    Restricted and monitored entrances will not prevent someone with a weapon of war from shooting as many people as he (let's face it, it's always a he) can. A metal detector and one or two paltry safety officers armed with handguns are not going to stop a sociopath with an AR-15.

    We can spend billions of dollars a year arming our schools to the teeth and turning buildings that are meant to teach children into virtual prisons or we can spend far less criminalizing the use and sale of weapons sociopaths use to shoot kids in our schools.

    Your newfound hero Joe Biden was right - shotguns are more than enough to defend yourself.

    jaredsxtn said: "Aren't you someone who ascribes to the theory that everything in the world can be free?"

    100% true if the tax system would free more money for jobs producing investments and increase the velocity of money. Prosperity is a choice.