Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Dockadams Wrote: But, but, but, we're supposed to be the party of NO now.
Haha. Except when we are able to pit Donald against his own party!
I'm a-ok with the Democrats working with Donald if they are able to split the Republican Party and pass bills that are center to center-left. We should fight fire with fire, but why not work with Donald to pass things that Democrats actually agree with?
Spoiler alert - Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders isn't President. Let's learn to be ok with our leadership working with Donald on things that will split the Republicans. I loathe Donald with every fiber of my being, but I have no problem with Democrats working with him to pass things that we actually agree with.
Dependents how things get structured\agreed. Yes, in this simple case all democrats did was propose what they wanted, and trump agrees. Nothing gambled, and nothing traded away.
My concern is that they end up working with trump on getting back something trump has already taken away, and concessions to trump are at the expense of other important issues.
trump takes away X by rolling back of President Obama policies because he hates President Obama.
democrats give away A,B,C to get X back. And it could be argued that X is more important than the combined value of A, B, C. But trump took away X because he knows its a powerful bargaining chip that Democrats want back. What will trump demand not to issue an executive order to deport dreamers after the 6th month deadline expires? I suspect he can demand pretty much his entire campaign promises in trade for allowing dreamers to legally stay, otherwise deportations begins.