what is the purpose of the Electoral College ?
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
We've all seen peitions lately to abolish the Electoral College. Due to the fact that both houses of Congress are now controlled by Republicans, that is not likely to happen. More importantly, the purpose of the Electoral College, AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED, would prevent people like Donald Tump from becoming President. Alexander Hamilton is the individual who is given credit for the idea, so it's fitting that the cast of "Hamilton" harassed Mike Pence last night in New York when he was in town to see the play. Naturally, our groper in chief quickly demanded that the cast apologize to Pence. Don't hold you breath, Donald. Here's the key phrasing: Although the Founding Fathers wanted the people to have a say, there was concern that a charismatic tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come into power. Since that is precisely what just happened, the only logical approach for the Electoral College to take is to vote for Hillary Clinton. The electors in Arizona are being bombarded with requests for them to NOT vote for Trump. Two electors in Colorado have already stated that they are not voting for Trump, and it is possible that electors in other states will do the same thing. Here is the rest of the article: http://www.reference.com/government-politics/purpose-electoral-college-c9f12a8548d434ee#
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
that guy in AZ Wrote:We've all seen peitions lately to abolish the Electoral College. Due to the fact that both houses of Congress are now controlled by Republicans, that is not likely to happen. More importantly, the purpose of the Electoral College, AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED, would prevent people like Donald Tump from becoming President. Alexander Hamilton is the individual who is given credit for the idea, so it's fitting that the cast of "Hamilton" harassed Mike Pence last night in New York when he was in town to see the play. Naturally, our groper in chief quickly demanded that the cast apologize to Pence. Don't hold you breath, Donald. Here's the key phrasing: Although the Founding Fathers wanted the people to have a say, there was concern that a charismatic tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come into power. Since that is precisely what just happened, the only logical approach for the Electoral College to take is to vote for Hillary Clinton. The electors in Arizona are being bombarded with requests for them to NOT vote for Trump. Two electors in Colorado have already stated that they are not voting for Trump, and it is possible that electors in other states will do the same thing. Here is the rest of the article: http://www.reference.com/government-politics/purpose-electoral-college-c9f12a8548d434ee# Guy, they call that in Dutch: "presenting mustard after the meal" The Electoral College has given their input and Trump is nominated; no one is going to change that, unless you want an total "war" in this government. Hopefully they change this weird thing in 2020, but I'm sure the GOP can influence this College to win again. Thus an nice "story" but we are sitting with the shit now and no one dares to change this. Trump is now King and everyone bows to him or crawls up his butt!! Amen
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
The GOP will be forced to improve their rapport next year, because the current protests and unpopularity of Trump spell defeat for them if they don't. On top of that, they're going to take every precaution they can to ensure they maintain power. This is what Bannon said in CNN's interview with him: "The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f---ed over. If (the Trump White House delivers), we'll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we'll govern for 50 years. " But even if the electoral college dropped the ball on Trump, it would surely incur a Civil War, if not a Republican movement even more rabid than the Tea Party and alt-right combined. So, either way, buckle up, boys. I still think the most likely scenario is that the electoral college supports Trump, but he becomes impeached. He doesn't appear invested in the main POTUS responsibilities, so he'll basically just act as a cheerleader for the GOP until he suffers from too many liabilities.
-
-
Democrat
Colorado Springs, CO
-
-
-
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Dutch Wrote:Shaking my old head; I've been hammering on this forever. But yeah like Schmidt says "this country" as well the naive stupid population does not want such change, because they only want changes which harms them, like electing Trump. Thus we will be stuck with the "electoral college" forever as well the "second Amendment" and some other stupid laws or non-laws, like not "vetting" an President, protecting the lobby system; pouring in billions into elections so you can corrupt it; protecting the healthcare industry, so they can get rich over your dead body; giving tax breaks to the rich instead of the poor or middle class; refusing an sliding scale of taxing etc. A lot has to change in this country to make it livable for the common people. How do you suggest we get rid of the electoral college outside of passing a new amendment to the Constitution? We get it. You don't like our Constitution. But what are you suggesting we do? Ignore it? I want nothing more than to get rid of the Electoral College, but I also understand that would require the passage of a new amendment to the Constitution. And if so called liberals can't bother to get off their ass to vote in Federal elections then why should anyone expect them to take time out of their busy day to actually vote to get rid of the Electoral College they profess to hate?
If people actually got off their ass and voted for once then maybe we would have a federal government that reflects the will of the people. But when people vote for candidates who could never win or, even worse, don't vote at all, then we get the government we deserve. Republicans are good at one thing - getting their people out to vote no matter how shitty their candidate is. That's because Republicans would rather vote for the devil himself than a Democrat. Democrats, on the other hand, would rather vote for someone who never stands a chance of winning because they just can't bring themselves to vote for someone who doesn't share 100% of their political views. How is that working out for us?
-
-
-
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
jaredsxtn Wrote:Dutch Wrote:Shaking my old head; I've been hammering on this forever. But yeah like Schmidt says "this country" as well the naive stupid population does not want such change, because they only want changes which harms them, like electing Trump. Thus we will be stuck with the "electoral college" forever as well the "second Amendment" and some other stupid laws or non-laws, like not "vetting" an President, protecting the lobby system; pouring in billions into elections so you can corrupt it; protecting the healthcare industry, so they can get rich over your dead body; giving tax breaks to the rich instead of the poor or middle class; refusing an sliding scale of taxing etc. A lot has to change in this country to make it livable for the common people. How do you suggest we get rid of the electoral college outside of passing a new amendment to the Constitution? We get it. You don't like our Constitution. But what are you suggesting we do? Ignore it? I want nothing more than to get rid of the Electoral College, but I also understand that would require the passage of a new amendment to the Constitution. And if so called liberals can't bother to get off their ass to vote in Federal elections then why should anyone expect them to take time out of their busy day to actually vote to get rid of the Electoral College they profess to hate?
If people actually got off their ass and voted for once then maybe we would have a federal government that reflects the will of the people. But when people vote for candidates who could never win or, even worse, don't vote at all, then we get the government we deserve. Republicans are good at one thing - getting their people out to vote no matter how shitty their candidate is. That's because Republicans would rather vote for the devil himself than a Democrat. Democrats, on the other hand, would rather vote for someone who never stands a chance of winning because they just can't bring themselves to vote for someone who doesn't share 100% of their political views. How is that working out for us? Jared, just look at the history since WWII; have we learned anything from our mistakes? Guess what; did we learn from Vietnam, Korea etc. no we've got more wars than ever (some already 14 years!!). Did we learn that the 2nd Amendment kills more people than ever because the idiots interpret that document wrong? Did we learn even after 45 Presidents that you have to screen/vet them properly? By stating that Republicans rather vote for the devil, that is true, but what are the Democrats offering? Mother Theresa? Don't forget 40% or more vote Republican; why? INDOCTRINATION by the churches, lobbyists, army, dumb area's like "coal belt, bible belt, rust belt, grain belt, cowboy belt, dirt belt, sand belt, naive belt, slave belt., and of course Fox news as well Breitbard B.S. etc. Thus what can you do other than have about two persons ( Pelosi and Schumer) defend something which is normal common sense? Why even loose an district in Georgia if you don't have an strong working plan to support the DNC candidate. Guess why?, because the GOP makes sure their indoctrination of lies etc. keeps working for them, even an fat ass dumb woman can win. Wow, Let alone in Montana; beat up an reporter and he still wins. And you still believe in this country? Honestly?
-
-
-
|