Are you sure you want to delete this post?
As I continue to browse social media and liberal leaning websites a common theme that I keep seeing is strong anti-Hillary statements. Dr. Jill Stein has picked up where Bernie Sanders has left off, but her rhetoric is even sharper, and sounds an awful lot like Donald Trump rhetoric. In an interview with Amy Goodman she is repeating all of the Republican talking points from Benghazi to Libya to E-mails. Goodman says that "Dr. Jill Stein is far better suited to be commander-in-chief than Hillary Clinton."
Really? If you believe that Amy Goodman, you need a reality check. Goodman and Stein ignore everything that Hillary Clinton has done to promote liberalism and progressivism and are engaging in a self righteous purity campaign against Hillary Clinton. If they are successful and Trump is elected, they can gloat.
Goodman states: "If Democrats lose to Trump, it wouldn’t be Jill Stein’s fault, and it wouldn’t be Bernie’s fault. I discuss in this segment that Clinton is barely above Trump in an average of polls. Look in the mirror Clinton supporters, and take a good look at Jill Stein."
She is a 99 percent match with Bernie Sanders and a 91 percent match with Hillary Clinton on issues. But it's not 100 percent, and she cannot therefore in good conscience support Hillary.
Yes I have taken a good look at Jill Stein, and although I can agree with many of her stances, I do not see her as a commander-in-chief, nor do I see her as presidential. I see her as an uncompromising ideologue who would have great difficulty in governing and seeking compromises with the Republicans. Voting for Jill Stein is throwing your vote away and maybe electing Donald Trump.