Forum Thread

Islamic attack in Philly?

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 16 - 18 of 18 Prev 1 2
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    No you are wrong again, you always like to play the same semantic game when your argument falls apart , the two shootings you cited are not related, in as much none were tied to any discussion of an Islamic terrorist act, my post was about the authorities here in Philly having completely different views on the same incident, one side see the facts, the other side goes by a political viewpoint. I asked for thoughts on that topic and only that topic, you saw fit to expand it into an altogether different area because you feel that this incident is some how similar to the other two you cited.Red herring / straw man , it doesn't change the fact that you decided to change the the topic by challenging whether I used the wrong descriptive word for what you were attempting to do, and that was to change the narrative and make it about me.
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    johnnycee Wrote: No you are wrong again, you always like to play the same semantic game when your argument falls apart , the two shootings you cited are not related, in as much none were tied to any discussion of an Islamic terrorist act, my post was about the authorities here in Philly having completely different views on the same incident, one side see the facts, the other side goes by a political viewpoint. I asked for thoughts on that topic and only that topic, you saw fit to expand it into an altogether different area because you feel that this incident is some how similar to the other two you cited.Red herring / straw man , it doesn't change the fact that you decided to change the the topic by challenging whether I used the wrong descriptive word for what you were attempting to do, and that was to change the narrative and make it about me.

    Let me get this straight. You want people to stay focused solely on a specific topic whenever you write a post, but it's ok for you to write about anything under the sun when you reply to one you didn't write? Have you ever read half of the shit you've written or is someone else writing that nonsense?

    Here's the thing--whenever a white person commits a mass shooting you will say it's an isolated incident, but whenever someone who doesn't look like you kills one person you say it's terrorism. All I'm doing is calling you out for being a hypocrite. And trust me--you're a hypocrite.

    We all get that you're a right wing, xenophobic zealot, but if you're going to rail about one shooting in the name of god then you need to rail about all shootings in the name of god.

  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Again you go on the attack, for what reason? you call out what you seem to think is a zealot when you should check the mirror, have you even attempted to make a reply to my original post, and yes we all at times do digress from the topic at hand and you often request that we get back on topic but you seem to make it a point, no somewhat of mission to prove to yourself that your views are , at least to my postings anyway, absolutely correct in every aspect and anything or anyone who holds an opposing viewpoint is to be belittled, why.? My posting was just a simple posting about one incident between two opposing points of view and wondered how others viewed it , especially someone outside the Phila. area. Btw, by calling me those names does it make you feel better, and I didn't know that you speak for all of the posters on here , just for the record I am none of those names that you ascribed to me.