Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Yes, it appeared to be a terrible tragedy. But Bush (Jr) told the world that it was terrorists from IRAQ that had done the whole thing. WRONG. That was just an excuse to go invade IRAQ to steal their oil. I also have a tape showing American journalist Dan Rather (from CBS News) who risked his life to go interview Saddam Hussein, in his own palace in IRAQ, & ask some penetrating questions. And Saddam Hussein, a very educated man, said he had NO "weapons of mass destruction" & that he had no desire for war, & he said he would "debate" George Bush on international satellite TV, and the whole world could watch & decide "who was telling the truth." Well, you know Bush fears NOTHING more than he fears the Truth. So of course he just ignored the suggestion. And a few days or weeks later, suddenly dropped "shock & awe" with hundreds of bombs and half-destroyed Saddam's kingdom. A WAR CRIME. Because as we now know, Saddam DID NOT have any weapons of mass destruction at all. It was all a figment of Bush's imagination, or else a "useful tool" to use as an excuse to go blow hell out of IRAQ. Here a few weeks earlier, Rumsfeld & other Bushie's pals were over acting "nice" to Saddam & trying to wangle big OIL deals, so Halliburton (Cheney) could cash in. Anyway, Saddam & his 2 sons had to be killed so they could not talk & tell the "facts" of all the oil deals going on, in Kuwait & elsewhere. But after Saddam & sons were cheated out of their own kingdom & "murdered" ala BUSH, then it was safe for Bush & Cheney to mop up all the oil for the next 12 years, & is still ongoing. Meanwhile the world NOW knows, Saddam Hussein had NO weapons or atom bombs, etc. He was a very smart and a relatively good ally to the USA. His worst mistake was to trust Bush & Cheney for even one minute.
Here I will put a video --- of Dan Rather (CBS news) interviewing Saddam Hussein, (in the palace in IRAQ):
----------------------------------near Sept, 2003 (back in a "flash" I hope)