Forum Thread

the string theroy and the quantum theroy that is all they are just theroys not fact

Reply to ThreadDisplaying 13 Posts
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    the string theroy and the quantum theroy that is all they are just theroys not fact

    show me the hard facts and i may belive but just like the theroies behind psychiatry they are just that a lot of probabilites and posabilites but no factual proof for there theroies
  • Liberal
    Independent
    Durham, NH
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    First off, try writing a coherent sentence with correct spelling, next tell us what you're trying to disprove and why, then, perhaps and only perhaps, you will be able to start a coherent dialogue with someone.
  • Center Left
    Independent
    Denton, TX
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Mr Vivian D Hankey Wrote: the string theroy and the quantum theroy that is all they are just theroys not fact

    show me the hard facts and i may belive but just like the theroies behind psychiatry they are just that a lot of probabilites and posabilites but no factual proof for there theroies
    Learn the definition of theory, then please come back.
  • Independent
    Widefield, CO
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Mr Vivian D Hankey Wrote: the string theroy and the quantum theroy that is all they are just theroys not fact

    show me the hard facts and i may belive but just like the theroies behind psychiatry they are just that a lot of probabilites and posabilites but no factual proof for there theroies
    The fact that they are theories means there is at least some proof of fact. Let me give you an example paraphrased from a book I've read... A scientist has a hypothesis (an idea) that the sky is yellow. He defines what yellow is, he defines what the sky is. He then walks outside and looks at the sky. Does the color of the sky match the definition of yellow he as he just defined it? If it does not, then his hypothesis is wrong and he creates a new on. If it does, he says his hypothesis is correct and the hypothesis becomes a theory. He then hands that theory off to others who then attempt to prove or disprove that theory. If the theory proves true a majority of the time (use of quantum physics to disprove not withstanding) it is accepted as scientific fact. Scientific fact does not have to be proven true 100% of the time to be accepted as fact. Here is something generally accepted as fact... The bigger an object is, the more gravity it has. Okay, that's true, but what about a black hole? A black hole can be smaller than an asteroid but exert more gravity than our sun.
  • Center Left
    Independent
    Denton, TX
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    RanmaMOJ Wrote:
    Mr Vivian D Hankey Wrote: the string theroy and the quantum theroy that is all they are just theroys not fact

    show me the hard facts and i may belive but just like the theroies behind psychiatry they are just that a lot of probabilites and posabilites but no factual proof for there theroies
    The fact that they are theories means there is at least some proof of fact. Let me give you an example paraphrased from a book I've read... A scientist has a hypothesis (an idea) that the sky is yellow. He defines what yellow is, he defines what the sky is. He then walks outside and looks at the sky. Does the color of the sky match the definition of yellow he as he just defined it? If it does not, then his hypothesis is wrong and he creates a new on. If it does, he says his hypothesis is correct and the hypothesis becomes a theory. He then hands that theory off to others who then attempt to prove or disprove that theory. If the theory proves true a majority of the time (use of quantum physics to disprove not withstanding) it is accepted as scientific fact. Scientific fact does not have to be proven true 100% of the time to be accepted as fact. Here is something generally accepted as fact... The bigger an object is, the more gravity it has. Okay, that's true, but what about a black hole? A black hole can be smaller than an asteroid but exert more gravity than our sun.
    Not exactly. If he finds that his hypothesis is correct, he then retests the hypothesis many times (refining the hypothesis along the way). If it still holds up, then he submits his hypothesis to to his peers in the scientific world. The peers then test and retest the hypothesis (also refining and adding notes). If the hypothesis then stands up, only then does it become a scientific theory. Once it becomes a theory, it continues to be tested and retested and further refined in the same manner.

    Science tries to refrain from calling any theory a fact. Calling something a fact insinuates that all possible evidence that can be collected has been collected and analyzed and correctly interpreted and that there will never be any new data to take into consideration. The phrase 'scientific fact' tends to be used more to describe theories to laymen who confuse 'theory' with 'hypothesis' when talking about scientific matters.
  • Liberal
    Other Party
    Llos Angeles, CA
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    string theory has yet to be deemed "fact" because scientific theory is way ahead of the current technology...... we don't have the means to prove it
  • Independent
    Widefield, CO
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    L.A. Citizen Wrote: string theory has yet to be deemed "fact" because scientific theory is way ahead of the current technology...... we don't have the means to prove it
    Agreed. And Zach, I was talking in general. I realize scientists hesitate to call anything FACT, but I'll point out an example that is widely regarded (even by scientists) as 'fact' when it is just a theory... "Global Warming is caused by humans." There have been several threads in this forum about whether or not that is true, but it is widely regarded as 'scientific fact' when there is some (granted limited) evidence to the contrary.
  • Liberal
    Other Party
    Llos Angeles, CA
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Hey Ranma,

    You're from Colorado.....why aren't you growing some of that medicine yet...?????/
  • Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        

    Hi people ,

    i dont think there just theories i mean its just a word and why should we condem mans imagination or dreams of invention.

    take this little test i did to day for expample of quantum and i do not have the intelligence as some do with their dreams of all they know and share with on tv ok....

    i started to play with dbg , moving all same time is real to end up at one spot .

    today i spun abracelet using my own hands but with dbg i later explain dbg

    i was fascinated by the perfect spins with no unbalance no wobbly spins , then dbg pulsated as it does time to time split the bracelt into perfect threes one left me with the point where the two join the other two were perfect three of beads also perfectly apart and near me in side the triangle was a lump from rest of the bracelet .

    in get this shape of Infinity the 8 symble

    i was holding the one three beads and ws so amazed . right before the split i heard noise and dbg changed colour .

    im amazed maybe not you but i am a believer in quantum

    i dont think there is two points as they say cuz going by my test today theres three lots of threes

    the mass in the middle closest to me still in triangle was amazing to see ..

    ahm

    when i sat down after shock slowed bit, i felt entanglement

    then my earring i touched moved from one area to another on my scalp i felt it still in my ear but when i felt the entanglement it hurt my head like stab pain i touched it and there was my earring

    now im not sure how to explain the perfect triangle but its real

    so far i can only move items over my body

    but maybe in time man can move more else where

    also i need to share this with u cuz im affraid someone will steal my idea

    i call it the Chris Triangle seeing no one else got this far

    i call what i want with my ideas

    thank you for listening

  • Strongly Liberal Democrat
    Democrat
    Pensacola, FL
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Donna LEON Wrote:

    Hi people ,

    i dont think there just theories i mean its just a word and why should we condem mans imagination or dreams of invention.

    take this little test i did to day for expample of quantum and i do not have the intelligence as some do with their dreams of all they know and share with on tv ok....

    i started to play with dbg , moving all same time is real to end up at one spot .

    today i spun abracelet using my own hands but with dbg i later explain dbg

    i was fascinated by the perfect spins with no unbalance no wobbly spins , then dbg pulsated as it does time to time split the bracelt into perfect threes one left me with the point where the two join the other two were perfect three of beads also perfectly apart and near me in side the triangle was a lump from rest of the bracelet .

    in get this shape of Infinity the 8 symble

    i was holding the one three beads and ws so amazed . right before the split i heard noise and dbg changed colour .

    im amazed maybe not you but i am a believer in quantum

    i dont think there is two points as they say cuz going by my test today theres three lots of threes

    the mass in the middle closest to me still in triangle was amazing to see ..

    ahm

    when i sat down after shock slowed bit, i felt entanglement

    then my earring i touched moved from one area to another on my scalp i felt it still in my ear but when i felt the entanglement it hurt my head like stab pain i touched it and there was my earring

    now im not sure how to explain the perfect triangle but its real

    so far i can only move items over my body

    but maybe in time man can move more else where

    also i need to share this with u cuz im affraid someone will steal my idea

    i call it the Chris Triangle seeing no one else got this far

    i call what i want with my ideas

    thank you for listening

    I try to give consideration to anything somebody has taken the time to write. I could not finish reading your post. That makes me question the purpose.
  • Democrat
    Missouri
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    Whoa.............looks like WUI (Writing Under the Influence) to me. Maybe good script writing for SCI-FY or a new "Hobbits in 3D" movie.
  • Center Left
    Independent
    Central, FL
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    You must have meant he/she was drunk. Otherwise they would have used capital I's.
  • Independent
    Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        
    TJ Wrote: You must have meant he/she was drunk. Otherwise they would have used capital I's.
    except in my case depending on whether I am using my iPad or my iMac. The iPad automatically corrects to "I". And I am too lazy to change it.