Caucus Elections Are Undemocratic and Should Be Scrapped

7.2k 32 66 11 4 Colorado Springs, CO

Sun May 29, 2016 23:23:23PM

Senator Sanders speaking at a rally in New HampshireBy: MichaelVadon

Bernie Sanders won the Washington state Democratic caucus by a “yuge” margin of 46 points, his largest margin of victory in his campaign. However, what is less known is that the highly publicized record voter turnout of 244,458 for the caucus was still relatively small compared to the much higher voter turn-outs for primaries and general elections. When this largely blue state held its primary election two months later, Hillary Clinton turned the tables and won by 5 points with 785,800 people voting. That’s a whopping three times more people voting in the primary than in the caucus. The caucus counted for official pledged delegates. The primary, despite its vastly larger turnout, did not count for anything. No additional pledged delegates awarded.

That scenario was repeated earlier in Nebraska, a red state. Bernie Sanders won the caucus by a 14 point margin garnering him the largest portion of the pledged delegates. Hillary Clinton won the primary with a much larger voter turn-out that garnered her a 6 point win margin, but that only got her a moral victory.

As a former Colorado precinct chair who has run caucus meetings, and has participated as a delegate in county and state conventions, I certainly have enjoyed the events and the comradeship of a block of like-minded, passionate Democrats. The caucuses bring out the loyal party activists, wonderful and knowledgeable people who you would enjoy drinking a beer with. However, what was also painfully apparent to me is that these events are not inclusive of the large majority and diversity of the Democratic Party.

I knocked on hundreds of doors the past few years encouraging fellow Democrats to attend our Tuesday evening caucus meetings, and heard all kinds of genuine apologies for why attending a caucus would be too difficult for them: Voters were working that evening, parents were staying home with children, grandparents were babysitting a grandchild, physically handicapped individuals answered the door in a wheel chair, senior citizens were just too elderly and frail to physically to make the effort; some didn’t own a car or another means of transportation to get there. Some voters had the ability to make it, but told me that they just didn’t feel comfortable in the caucus venue itself, having attended in the past.

However, in a primary election with the ease of early voting and mail-in/drop-off ballots, these barriers hindering voters from participating in our democracy are not present. A working mom, for example, will find time in her busy week to sit quietly in the solitude of the kitchen table after the kids have gone to bed and fill in the ballot. Her primary election vote should count. On the other hand, her excused absence from a caucus effectively amounts to disenfranchisement.

Bernie Sanders, an outspoken critic of closed primaries, is conspicuously silent on the unfairness of caucuses. And understandably so as he has benefited enormously by the caucus process winning 11 of the 13 states holding Democratic caucuses to date. He barely lost the Iowa and Nevada caucuses to Hillary Clinton. Otherwise he might have had a clean sweep of the caucuses. The young people who he has inspired to attend the caucuses in large numbers are highly passionate and largely responsible for his caucus wins. Kudos to him. Hillary Clinton, to her credit, does not complain about the unfairness. She simply cites the fact that overall she has 3 million more votes than Bernie, largely because of the larger voter participation in her primary election wins.

The results of the primaries in Washington and Nebraska dispel the false notion that Bernie supporters make that if Bernie’s margin of victory in his eleven caucus wins were scaled up to the typical kind of voter turnout in primary elections, Hillary’s 3 million vote lead in total votes would not seem so large. On the contrary, without the unfairness of the limited participation of voters in the caucuses, Hillary Clinton would have already locked up the nomination.

More inclusiveness of all voters in primary elections should be embraced by everyone, and to do that we must start the process in the respective state legislatures and state parties to scrap the archaic and undemocratic caucuses entirely. In my state of Colorado, members of the state legislature have twice proposed legislation to scrap the caucuses and select party candidates by the primary system. In the first attempt, the legislation was defeated. In the second it was approved in committees but not taken up for a full vote prior to adjournment of the State Assembly. Voters in all caucus states need to put continual pressure on state legislatures to scrap the caucuses.

One person…one vote.

3 Recommendations

You must be logged in to add a comment. You may signup for a free account to get started or login to your existing account.
Eliminate voter fraud

Public Online Database for Election Results (Review/Confirm your voter result selections and view demographics data).

Share & sign

This petition is to mandate that all government voting results whether county, state or national level be required to display results publicly online. The public displaying of voting results will help to eliminate any fraudulent voter results by allowing millions of voters to check and verify results online by demographics and down to the individual person(s).

Voters will receive Unique ID Numbers (UIN) that will register directly to a their name and other personal ID information within the system. Names/PII will not be displayed publicly in demographics and individual persons listing, only UIN will be publicized. However person(s) should be able to enter their own UIN and provide social/pin to view that the UIN listed is indeed registered to their name only with correct voting results.
TJNew member
4.9k 0 2 4 2 Central, FL

1768 days ago
Replies (0)
John Oliver did a great show about the primaries and caucus process. Look it up if you can as it was informative and sadly humorous. Our processes are a total mess. It's sad how we're all over the place on the way we select candidates.
7.2k 32 66 11 4 Colorado Springs, CO

1769 days ago
Replies (0)
For those who are paying attention, Bernie Sanders won the North Dakota caucus on Tuesday evening by a "yuge" margin. At exactly the same time, Hillary Clinton won the primary in South Dakota. The demographics of the two states are similar. However, the South Dakota primary was more inclusive with a considerably larger voter turn-out. Another piece of evidence that caucuses are undemocratic and should be scrapped.
1778 days ago
Replies (0)
I also find it very striking how Bernie seems to slam on "undemocratic" way of voting, but is eerily silent on an actual undemocratic way of voting. We definitely need to get rid of the caucuses and while we're at it completely change how the primary system is conducted.

I'm of the belief that we should rotate the states that get to go first every election cycle. We should mix it up and have big and small states vote on the same day so we can get a better understanding of where the country really stands. One thing I really can't wrap my head around is the fact that California has one tenth of the entire American population, but is basically cut out of the nomination process every four years because they go so late in the season. That's something that also needs to change.