Scandals & Controversies
Donald Trump Scandals
U.S. Congress Members
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Is Just Wrong
Tue Jul 01, 2014 04:53:32AM |
Obamacare (Affordable Care Act)
Supreme Court Cases
Recommended Blog Articles
Russia Duped Bernie and Stein Voters Too
Jumpsuit or Tailored Suit? It Depends What Crime You’re Accused Of
Donald Trump: From Bad Businessman to Worst President
Bill Maher Brings on Obama Impersonator to Read Trump Quotes
Trump Holds Cabinet Meeting so They Can Publicly Laud Him
There is a Method to Donald Trump's "Madness" Democrats Need to Take Seriously
The Mormon Choir’s bad choices
The Seven States That Will Make or Break a New Democratic Senate Majority
What if Donald Trump Said This About Your Daughter?
Who Said It? Alec Baldwin or Donald Trump?
Supreme Court Building
By: Public Domain
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby could deny its employees certain health care coverage, in this case contraception, based on religious beliefs. This means that companies can now prohibit or restrict its employees from partaking in actions that are legal under US law but not in line the religious views of the company.
The biggest question that comes to mind after reading this ruling is: “If Hobby Lobby was an Islamic company instead of a Christian one, and Hobby Lobby wanted to impose parts of Sharia Law on it’s employees would the Supreme Court still have ruled in the same manner?”
Another extremely worrisome application of this ruling is how it could erode the quality of healthcare in America. What if a for-profit Jehova’s Witness owned company wanted to exclude all types of blood transfusions and some types of organ transplants? People who are in dire need of medical attention could be restricted by the beliefs of the company they work for.
Which slides right to the next absurdity, the beliefs of the company. The Supreme Court once again ruled that corporations are people and are therefore provided the all the rights of a person. With this ruling, corporations also seem to be first-class people who are potentially allowed to discriminate and make limited decisions about its employees’ health.
Essentially, this ruling is just backwards. There would be a strong argument if Hobby Lobby was a non-profit organization, but they are for-profit company that operates in the free market and they should not be able to impose their religious beliefs on the work force that they utilize to turn a profit.
You must be logged in to add a comment. You may
for a free account to get started or
to your existing account.