Democratic Hub
About Us
Tour
FAQ
Signup
Login
  
Home
Forums
Pages
Issues
Laws
Elections
Arguments
Events
Government
U.S.
World
Welcome to our New Political Community - Take a Quick Tour of our Features including our Discussion Forums custom designed for U.S. politics. SIGN UP today to join in the discussion.
Forums > All Posts > The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science
  • Forums
  • Categories
  • All Posts
  • Forum Rules
  • FAQ\Help
Displaying all 2 Forum Posts

You must be logged in to reply to a post.
2011-04-24 10:57 PM

Schmidt
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1058
Reference: Chris Mooney, Mother Jones, The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science, April 18, 2011

As one who has had numerous "no win" arguments with my Republican friends, I related to this article by Chris Mooney. Mooney quotes celebrated Stanford University psychologist Leon Festinger"

"A MAN WITH A CONVICTION is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts or figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point."

That is the theme of Moodey's article as he discusses "how our brains fool us on climate, creationism, and the vaccine-autism link. "  For those that are into this stuff you'll enjoy reading it. I'll extract a few paragraphs that appealed to me.

"It all raises the question: Do left and right differ in any meaningful way when it comes to biases in processing information, or are we all equally susceptible?

"There are some clear differences. Science denial today is considerably more prominent on the political right—once you survey climate and related environmental issues, anti-evolutionism, attacks on reproductive health science by the Christian right, and stem-cell and biomedical matters. More tellingly, anti-vaccine positions are virtually nonexistent among Democratic officeholders today—whereas anti-climate-science views are becoming monolithic among Republican elected officials.

"Some researchers have suggested that there are psychological differences between the left and the right that might impact responses to new information—that conservatives are more rigid and authoritarian, and liberals more tolerant of ambiguity. Psychologist John Jost of New York University has further argued that conservatives are "system justifiers": They engage in motivated reasoning to defend the status quo."

Read the entire article at the above link.  We've discussed other related articles in this website and have used such terms as "reptilian brain" for discussing a lack of empathy.  It's all interesting stuff, but a bit discouraging for us that have tried to argue with facts and don't make any difference...

2011-04-25 11:24 AM
Square Main Photo
Burnface
Parker, AZ
Posts: 51
There is little more to say in terms of anything positive about the neanderthal right wing.
You must be logged in to reply to a post.


 

 
About Us
Contact Us
FAQ
Advertise
Links
Login
Sign Up
  


� Copyright 2009-2012 Democratic Hub. All Rights Reserved.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy


OBAMA ACCOMPLISHMENTS - REPUBLICAN DIVORCES - REPUBLICAN INFIDELITY & AFFAIRS - REPUBLICAN SCANDALS & CONTROVERSIES