Democratic Hub
About Us
Tour
FAQ
Signup
Login
  
Home
Forums
Pages
Issues
Laws
Elections
Arguments
Events
Government
U.S.
World
Welcome to our New Political Community - Take a Quick Tour of our Features including our Discussion Forums custom designed for U.S. politics. SIGN UP today to join in the discussion.
Forums > All Posts > State department warns other countries to not retaliate
  • Forums
  • Categories
  • All Posts
  • Forum Rules
  • FAQ\Help
Displaying all 2 Forum Posts

You must be logged in to reply to a post.
2011-01-08 04:17 PM
Square Photo
LLBarry
Beverly, MA
Posts: 299
"The State Department on Friday warned foreign governments not to retaliate against human rights activists or others whose dealings with American officials were disclosed in secret diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters that certain governments have been told that if they take what Crowley called "adverse actions" against sources cited in the cables it would harm relations with the United States. Crowley didn't say which governments have been warned, or describe any specific instance of retaliation." See article. 

This is a decision from the government that is both good and bad. It's good because it's encouraging other countries to not punish anyone; however, would the US really allow relations to go bad if they do? I feel like its an empty threat.

What do think? Empty threat or real?

2011-01-10 05:44 PM
Square Main Photo
indianacarnie
Jeffersonville, IN
Posts: 77
Empty threat. Especially if one of the countries was China. Or Saudi Arabia.

Does anyone but me see the irony behind this, as our doj seeks to "retaliate" against wikileaks and Julian?
You must be logged in to reply to a post.


 

 
About Us
Contact Us
FAQ
Advertise
Links
Login
Sign Up
  


� Copyright 2009-2012 Democratic Hub. All Rights Reserved.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy


OBAMA ACCOMPLISHMENTS - REPUBLICAN DIVORCES - REPUBLICAN INFIDELITY & AFFAIRS - REPUBLICAN SCANDALS & CONTROVERSIES