About Us
Tour
FAQ
Signup
Login
Home
Forums
Pages
Issues
Laws
Elections
Arguments
Events
Government
U.S.
World
Welcome to our New Political Community
- Take a
Quick Tour
of our Features including our
Discussion Forums
custom designed for U.S. politics.
SIGN UP
today to join in the discussion.
Issues
>
Civil & Human Rights
>
Forum
>
Thread
Add Political Issue Content
Civil & Human Rights
Forum
Laws
Views
Charts
Quotes
Videos
Cartoons
Photos
Articles
Updates
Displaying all 1 Forum Posts for the Thread:
Sex Offender Compliance
You must be logged in to reply to a post.
2010-08-01 11:54 AM
LLBarry
Beverly, MA
Posts:
299
Currently, North Dakota is not in compliance with the federal laws for Sex Offender Regulations. The state holds that it is in 99% compliance with the laws but refuses to comply to the rest of them because of a difference of opinon. This is great. I feel that it is not often that a state stands up for a better way.
In this case, "one of those areas of differences is how sex offenders are assessed for risk. The federal law says risk should be based on the statute the offender was convicted of. North Dakota has a committee that evaluates not just the crime, but factors that could increase the risk of reoffending." See
Article
.
What do you think? Do you beleive that states should comply and then fight the laws or straight out fight the laws?
You must be logged in to reply to a post.
About Us
Contact Us
FAQ
Advertise
Links
Login
Sign Up
� Copyright 2009-2011 Democratic Hub. All Rights Reserved.
Terms & Conditions
|
Privacy Policy
OBAMA ACCOMPLISHMENTS
-
REPUBLICAN DIVORCES
-
REPUBLICAN INFIDELITY & AFFAIRS
-
REPUBLICAN SCANDALS & CONTROVERSIES