About Us

Tour

FAQ

Signup

Login

Welcome to our New Political Community - Take a Quick Tour of our Features including our Discussion Forums custom designed for U.S. politics. SIGN UP today to join in the discussion.

Displaying all 1 Forum Posts for the Thread:

Why can't we tax to pay for wars?

You must be logged in to reply to a post.

2009-12-10 11:23 AM

Schmidt
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 854

Reference: The American Prospect, Paul Waldman, The Spending Wars, Dec 9, 2009

Paul Waldman discusses how in the past "the ebb and flow of federal taxation was largely dictated by war."

"As this handy "History of the U.S. Tax System" from the U.S. Treasury explains, we raised taxes to pay for wars over and over again."

However, "since the 1960s, Republicans have driven our rhetoric about government spending and taxes. They successfully defined taxation as the taking of money from honest, hardworking Americans and giving it to undeserving, shiftless leeches."

"Republicans have also managed to ensure that military spending isn't really considered spending at all, something that becomes evident whenever they start talking budgets."

"That we will debate the cost of domestic initiatives is a given. But saying we have to sacrifice them in order to pay for the military would imply that the military is something that we actually have to pay for. And that isn't part of the conversation."

So why shouldn't Congress pass a war surtax to pay for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? Give me one good reason? The alternatives are to drive deficits higher as per the Bush years, or cut domestic spending. Which is it? What domestic programs should be cut to pay for more bombs and bullets?

You must be logged in to reply to a post.

About Us

FAQ

Advertise

Links

Login

Sign Up

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

OBAMA ACCOMPLISHMENTS - REPUBLICAN DIVORCES - REPUBLICAN INFIDELITY & AFFAIRS - REPUBLICAN SCANDALS & CONTROVERSIES